Donald Trump faces Supreme Court setback on tariff authority in Learning Services ruling, but strategic use of remaining ...

The Supreme Court ruled Friday that President Trump overstepped his authority in ordering tariffs on nearly everything the U.S. imports. Here's some economic context to understand that decision.

The US administration will now seek to replicate the tariff landscape Trump pursued under IEEPA with alternative trade statutes.

It was always unthinkable that President Donald Trump would choose a new “most beautiful word” in the dictionary after the Supreme Court knocked back his emergency tariff powers.

For Montanan industries, uncertainty remains as the nation’s high court invalidates a swath of Trump’s trade agenda.

The US Supreme Court ruled against the tariffs imposed by Trump under IEEPA. Based on the financial world’s initial reaction, ...

After the US Supreme Court ruled against President Trump’s import tariff measures, his first reaction (after harshly ...

U.S. allies and partners like the U.K. and the European Union facing higher tariffs but countries like Brazil, China and India get a reprieve.

The Supreme Court did not change the principle, simply the set of tools. Now Congress should build a trade framework that lasts.

The Supreme Court struck down President Trump's signature tariffs. But the president has other tariff tools, and consumers shouldn't expect cheaper prices anytime soon, economists say.

CFR President Michael Froman analyzes the aftermath of a Supreme Court decision that struck down tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

President Donald Trump has repeatedly said foreigners would pay for his import tariffs. A new report says Americans picked up ...