Most of the Trump administration’s legal disputes involving the firing of high-level officials deal with the scope of ...

After a California judge or justice determines there is ambiguity in a state statute, they will turn to consideration of ...

A Victorian Supreme Court trial is forging ahead with amended transcripts after an interpreter made more than 200 translation ...

While the U.S. Supreme Court often garners the most media attention, the vast majority of cases are determined in state ...

Columbus safety leaders warn Ginther’s proposed budget cuts could endanger the public, spark civil rights issues when detainees can't be booked into jail.

A case that started in Gibson County may soon have far-reaching results when the Tennessee Supreme Court hears arguments ...

A coalition of gun rights advocacy groups is urging the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold a lower court ruling that deemed the ...

The Supreme Court’s Republican majority spent much of Tuesday morning trying to figure out how two mutually exclusive ...

The Supreme Court's decison on President Trump's abilty to fire a member of the Federal Reserve could have big consequences for the economy.

In July 2025, multiple federal agencies announced a reinterpretation of provisions of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity ...

Empirical SCOTUS is a recurring series by Adam Feldman that looks at Supreme Court data, primarily in the form of opinions and oral arguments, to provide insights into the justices’ decision making ...

While the elimination of permanent alimony drew immediate attention, a quieter provision embedded in the statute is now ...